Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Little vs Samir Hamza Reguig Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Little vs Reguig analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Little vs Samir Hamza Reguig Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Little 1 - 0 Reguig
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Little has won 48.44% of points on their second serve, while Reguig has won 38.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Little, in recent form, has won 51.01% of their opponent's second serve points, while Reguig has won 51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.02% and 37.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Little has saved 62.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Reguig has saved 43.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Little has won 41.67% of matches played (W/L 10/ 14), with Reguig winning 44.26% (W/L 27/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Little has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8). Reguig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 44/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Little has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/ 12), where as Reguig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45% of matches (W/L 27/ 33). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Little winning 1 times and Reguig being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Little winning 2 and Reguig winning 0. The last match between Little and Reguig was at the M15 Monastir, 23-05-2024, Second, Hard with Daniel Little getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Little and Reguig have played a deciding set 0 times, with Little winning 0 times and Reguig 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Little winning 0, and Reguig 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Little has played against opponents with an average rank of 102.29 while Reguig has played against players with an average rank of 83.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Little has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Reguig has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Little has converted 43.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Reguig has converted 43.87% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
843
Rank
564
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
871
Rank
811
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
56% (98-77)
Career Total W/L
50% (100-99)
50% (7-7)
YTD W/L
42% (11-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniel Little vs Samir Hamza Reguig For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Little VS Reguig
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Daniel Little | Samir Hamza Reguig |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:3:0 | 1:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (25/45) | 65% (24/37) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (20/25) | 42% (10/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (12/20) | 15% (2/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 68% (25/37) | 29% (13/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Daniel Little
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Little | Samir Hamza Reguig |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (7/7) | 42% (11/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (14/15) | 41% (23/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (140/133) | 45% (225/277) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 44% (7/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 78 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 23 | 64 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:17 | 1:22:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 56.36 | 114.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (500/853) | 70% (947/1344) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (366/500) | 51% (486/947) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (171/353) | 38% (151/396) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (28/65) | 44% (68/155) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (308/837) | 42% (569/1343) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 54% (7/6) | 42% (11/15) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (7/14) | 39% (9/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 20% (15/3) |
Daniel Little Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
44%
(
21 of
48)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luc Fomba
Player
Daniel Little
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Demetris Azoides
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Rayane Oumaouche
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Daniel Little
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Joshua Charlton
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
78%
(
70 of
90)
12
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 7-6(2) 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Mason Naumovski
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Daniel Little
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Samir Hamza Reguig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Khazime
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
65%
(
93 of
144)
1st Serve %
71%
(
100 of
140)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
56%
(
52 of
93)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
57 of
100)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
45%
(
65 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
64 of
140)
143
Total Points Won
141
|
6-7(6) 7-6(7) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samir Hamza Reguig
Player
Max Wiskandt
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
76%
(
55 of
72)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 | def. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Karan Singh
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Donski
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Little Vs Reguig Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Little are available here and Reguig photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
